Mayco Vs Amaco Glazes What Is The Difference

Standing in front of a shelf full of glaze bottles from two well known brands, genuinely unsure which one to reach for, is a moment almost every potter has experienced at some point. At Le Studio Art Space, helping a member choose between Mayco and Amaco comes up regularly, and the honest answer is that neither brand is objectively better, they simply suit different creative goals, budgets, and finish styles, and knowing those differences upfront saves a lot of trial and error at the glazing table.

This comparison aims to give clear, honest criteria for when each option genuinely makes sense, rather than declaring an overall winner between two respected names in the ceramics world.

Both companies have been supplying working potters, schools, and studios for decades, and both show up constantly in glaze recommendations across ceramics forums and supplier catalogues, which is exactly why the comparison comes up so often in the first place, especially among potters newer to choosing glazes for themselves.

What Mayco Is Known For

Mayco has built a strong reputation around glazes that reward experimentation, particularly its Jungle Gems Crystal Glazes line, a cone 06 range formulated to produce dramatic, speckled crystalline texture within a low fire glaze rather than through the slow cooling technique used in true high fire crystalline work, making a dramatic effect accessible without a specialised firing schedule.

Mayco’s Stroke and Coat underglaze line is another standout, popular for its brush-on ease and reliable colour consistency across a huge range of shades, making it a genuinely accessible entry point for potters newer to decorating with colour.

Mayco’s broader catalogue also includes the Elements and Foundations lines, offering more textured, mineral-inspired finishes that lean into organic, layered visual effects rather than the smoother, more uniform look of many traditional glaze ranges.

Mayco’s product range covers a genuinely wide firing spectrum too, from low fire cone 06 lines through to some mid range options, giving potters working across different clay bodies and kiln setups a reasonable amount of flexibility within one brand.

What Amaco Is Known For

Amaco’s Potter’s Choice line is arguably its most recognised glaze range, a collection of reactive, cone 5 to 6 glazes designed specifically to layer beautifully with one another, producing breaking edges and colour variation when two or more are combined on a single piece.

Amaco also produces the Velvet Underglaze line, a dependable, wide ranging colour palette that fires across cone 05 through 10 with generally consistent results, and the brand’s long history in American ceramics manufacturing includes Brent pottery wheels and kilns alongside its glaze and underglaze catalogue.

This breadth across glazes, underglazes, wheels, and kilns gives Amaco a genuinely comprehensive presence in a working studio, well beyond just one standout product line.

Amaco’s long manufacturing history in the United States, dating back decades, has also given the brand a well documented track record that many studios and schools rely on specifically for its consistency across large, repeated orders, year after year, without unpredictable formulation changes.

How Their Finishes And Colour Ranges Compare

Mayco’s Jungle Gems and Elements lines lean toward dramatic, high-texture, high-contrast effects, genuinely striking on decorative work where a bold, layered surface is the goal rather than a smooth, predictable finish.

Amaco’s Potter’s Choice line leans toward a more painterly, reactive breaking effect at the edges of forms, giving depth and colour variation without the heavier surface texture that Mayco’s specialty lines produce.

Neither approach is inherently better, but they do genuinely suit different aesthetic goals, and many potters end up keeping both brands on the shelf specifically to reach for whichever effect a particular piece calls for.

Colour saturation also differs subtly between the two, with Mayco’s Stroke and Coat line generally offering brighter, more vivid single-coat colour, while Amaco’s Velvet Underglaze and Potter’s Choice ranges tend toward slightly more muted, earthy tones that suit a more traditional aesthetic.

Price And Availability Differences

Both brands are widely available through major ceramic supply retailers, and pricing between comparable pint or gallon sizes tends to be broadly similar, though specific product lines within each brand can vary depending on formulation complexity.

For Australian potters specifically, both brands are generally sourced through the same specialty ceramic suppliers that import American glaze brands, so availability tends to track together rather than one brand being consistently easier to find than the other, though stock levels for specific colours can fluctuate seasonally with supplier ordering cycles.

Shipping costs and lead times for imported glaze can add up for a smaller studio, which is part of why many working studios, including community spaces like Le Studio Art Space, buy in bulk and make a curated shared shelf available to members rather than everyone sourcing individually, which also gives members access to a wider range than most individuals would reasonably stock at home.

Buying test-size sample jars first, when available, is a genuinely sensible way for an individual potter to try both brands before committing to a larger pint or gallon size of any specific colour or finish.

What Competing Guides Leave Out

How the two brands layer together rarely gets covered with real practical detail. Many potters find that combining a Mayco textured base with an Amaco Potter’s Choice glaze on top, or vice versa, can produce genuinely unique results neither brand’s own combination charts specifically document.

Whether mixing brands on one piece is safe practice is a fair, honest question, and the general answer is that it’s commonly done, though testing any new combination on a sample tile first remains good practice regardless of which two brands or specific products are involved, since even glazes within the same brand can react unpredictably when combined without prior testing.

Firing range compatibility is another detail worth double-checking before mixing brands, since not every glaze within a brand’s catalogue shares the same cone rating, and layering a cone 06 glaze with a cone 6 glaze without checking first can produce disappointing or unpredictable results.

Application order between the two brands is rarely documented clearly either, and many experienced potters find that testing which glaze works best as the base coat versus the top coat, rather than assuming either order works equally well, makes a genuine difference to the final layered result.

Which Brand Suits Which Kind Of Potter

A potter drawn to bold, textured, statement surfaces on decorative work will likely gravitate toward Mayco’s specialty lines, while a potter who wants dependable, painterly, layerable results on everyday functional ware may find Amaco’s Potter’s Choice range a better everyday fit.

Budget and how much experimentation a potter enjoys also genuinely factor in, since Mayco’s more dramatic specialty lines sometimes reward a bit more testing and patience than Amaco’s more predictable, well documented layering system.

Most studios report that having both brands genuinely available, rather than committing fully to one, gives members the widest creative range without forcing an unnecessary choice between two respected options.

Ultimately, trying both brands hands-on, rather than reading comparisons alone, is genuinely the fastest way to develop a personal preference, since how a glaze feels to apply and how it fires on your own clay body matters more than any general description can capture.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is one of these brands actually better quality than the other?

Not really. Both are well established, reputable brands with decades of manufacturing history. The better fit genuinely depends on the finish and effect a specific piece calls for, not one brand being objectively superior.

Can I really mix Mayco and Amaco glazes on the same piece?

Many potters do this successfully, though it’s worth testing on a sample tile first. Checking that both products share a compatible cone rating is the most important step before combining them on a real piece.

Why does my Mayco glaze look nothing like the bottle sample?

This is common with reactive and textured lines like Jungle Gems, since thickness, application, and kiln position all affect the final crystalline or textured result considerably more than with a more predictable glaze.

Is Amaco Potter’s Choice good for a total beginner?

Yes, genuinely. Its well documented layering combinations and consistent results make it a fairly forgiving choice for someone newer to glazing, which is part of why it shows up often in classes at Le Studio Art Space.

Do I need to pick just one brand for my whole studio practice?

Not at all. Many potters use both brands for different purposes, reaching for whichever line suits a specific piece’s intended finish rather than committing exclusively to a single glaze manufacturer.

---

This article is provided for general educational purposes by Le Studio Art Space and reflects publicly available product information and common studio practice.